Does your Lead-to-Order process produce repeatable, scalable revenue?
Board-grade structural diagnosis for $5M–$50M technology companies. Six dimensions. Scored and benchmarked.
Delivered by former GM / CxO at Vodafone, O2, Symantec, Equifax and Staples. $2B–$15B revenue operating experience. Five working days. $2,950 (£2,350).
70–85% of $5M–$100M B2B technology companies are missing their growth targets
Not because the team isn't working hard enough. Because the operating architecture behind revenue acquisition was designed for a company half the current size — and nobody rebuilt it.
The process that got you to $5M breaks at $10M. The process that got you to $10M breaks at $25M. Pipeline coverage erodes. Forecasts lose credibility. The CEO ends up rescuing deals personally. A sales leader gets replaced — and structural performance doesn't improve, because the problem was never the person.
CEOs, CROs, and VP Sales see the symptoms. Missed quarters. Forecast variance. Deals that stall without explanation. But the people closest to revenue rarely have the time or mandate to step back and diagnose the process.
"This is not a sales problem. It is not a marketing problem. It is not a data problem. It is a Lead-to-Order architecture problem."
The Structural Assessment is not a revenue audit.
A revenue audit tells you what your numbers are. The Structural Assessment specifies what must exist before your CRM can produce better ones.
An audit surfaces symptoms. The assessment identifies the architectural error, scores it on the L2O Index, and delivers the Revenue Machine roadmap. The result is not a performance report. It is an architecture specification.
If this assessment does not show you something about your revenue architecture that your own team has missed — you pay nothing.
Five deliverables. Zero hedge.
Here is exactly what the Structural Assessment produces — not an estimate, not a framework deck. Specific outputs from your specific business.
L2O Index Score
Your Lead-to-Order maturity score across all six architectural dimensions — precisely where you sit on the 0–4 scale. Every dimension rated against companies at your stage and in your sector. No opinions. Data.
Revenue Machine Gap Analysis
Exactly what is required to reach 3.0+ across all six dimensions. Not a wish list. A sequenced specification of what must be built, in what order, to reach Revenue Machine.
Specific Architectural Findings
What is missing, where it's missing, and why — mapped to each lifecycle stage. What the broken parts are costing you, calculated from your actual conversion rates, pricing, and retention.
Prioritised Architecture Roadmap
A sequenced plan of architectural interventions, ordered by impact and implementation speed. Not 47 recommendations. One clear roadmap with a Revenue Machine endpoint.
15-Minute Video Walkthrough
Your L2O Index score, gap analysis, architectural findings, roadmap, and CRM configuration specification delivered as a narrated video. Watch it when you want. Share it with your leadership team. Take it to the board. Or use it to build the internal case for change.
Six architectural dimensions. Each one scored.
The L2O Index measures your revenue architecture across six dimensions that span the full Lead-to-Order lifecycle. Each dimension is rated 0–4. Most companies we assess score below 2 in at least three.
-
1
Signal Architecture
Are you reaching the right buyers with the right message — or generating activity that never converts? Signal Architecture defines how market attention is created and qualified before it enters the pipeline.
-
2
Pipeline Structure
Does your pipeline tell you what is actually going to close — or is it a list of deals at stages nobody can define? Pipeline Structure defines how opportunities are created, qualified, and advanced.
-
3
Conversion Mechanics
Are deals moving forward because buyers are ready — or because reps are pushing them through stages that mean nothing? Conversion Mechanics defines what must be true for each stage transition.
-
4
Pricing Realisation
Are you getting paid what your product is worth — or is every deal discounted and nobody knows by how much? Pricing Realisation defines how commercial outcomes are defended at each deal stage.
-
5
Retention & Expansion
Is your existing revenue growing — or are you replacing churned customers with new ones and calling it progress? This dimension defines how the architecture extends beyond the initial close.
-
6
Process Integrity
Does your CRM enforce your architecture — or does it reflect what reps chose to enter? Process Integrity defines how the Lead-to-Order architecture is maintained, governed, and trusted by the board.
Thirty minutes of your time. Five days to delivery.
The Structural Assessment is designed to run around your schedule. The input required from you is minimal. The output is board-ready.
30-Minute Structured Conversation
Not a discovery call. A structured conversation across seven areas: where revenue actually comes from, what the pipeline really looks like, how deals move through the business, what happens after the sale, how pricing works in practice, what the board is asking about, and where AI fits in. Same structure, every engagement. No preparation required on your side.
Your Data Against the Market
Everything you share is benchmarked against published data from KeyBanc, SaaS Capital, High Alpha, and Bessemer — combined with pattern recognition from 25 years of building and fixing revenue processes in the $5M–$50M band. AI-powered benchmarking compresses the analysis. The judgement comes from operator experience.
Six Scores. Six Answers.
Each part of the revenue process gets a score from 1 to 5, benchmarked against companies at your stage and in your sector. Each score comes with a written observation: something specific about your business that your internal team has not seen.
What the Gaps Are Costing You
Your scores, your conversion rates, your pricing data, and your retention figures are run through a model that produces one number: the estimated quarterly revenue you are losing because of how the process is built. Not a theory. A figure from your own business.
One Verdict. No Ambiguity.
Your revenue process gets one of four classifications: Structurally Sound, Execution-Degraded, Architecturally Misaligned, or Process-Deficient. The full report comes with a 15-minute video walkthrough you watch on your own time. Share it with your leadership team, take it to the board, or use it to build the internal case for change.
See exactly what the Assessment delivers
This is a complete Lead-to-Order Structural Assessment for an anonymised $7M Cloud ERP company. Every section, every score, every operator annotation, every cost quantification — exactly as delivered.
- Six dimensions scored against sector benchmarks
- Quarterly revenue cost of architectural gaps — calculated from the company's own data
- Specific structural findings per dimension, with operator annotations
- Sequenced remediation roadmap to Revenue Machine
- One of four verdicts — no hedge, no ambiguity
Anonymised. Delivered as PDF. No email required.
Architecturally Misaligned. Pipeline Structure and Process Integrity are breaking the forecast. Quarterly revenue impact: estimated £180K–£240K.
Walkthrough: Structure of the Assessment
Michael Williamson narrates the sample assessment — explaining the structural patterns, the operator annotations, and how the cost quantification is derived from the company's own data.
Book a 15-Minute Assessment Call
A 15-minute call to confirm this is right for your situation — before any fee is involved. No pitch. No pressure. You decide whether to proceed.
- Confirm the assessment is appropriate for your stage and sector
- Understand exactly what you will receive and when
- Ask any questions about the methodology or process
- Proceed only if it makes sense for your business
If the assessment does not show you something about your revenue process that your own team has missed, you pay nothing. No forms. No conditions.
The diagnostic that changes the conversation.
The Structural Assessment reveals whether you are investing at the CRM layer to solve an architecture layer problem. Most companies are. That finding changes the conversation — with your team, your board, and your CRM partner.
Five working days
30 minutes your time
Pay-nothing guarantee
You choose who sees it
Everything you need to know before booking.
Straight answers. No qualifications.
What do I need to do?
Have a 30-minute conversation. That is it. No data room. No system access. No preparation. We ask the questions. You talk about your business.
How is this different from a sales audit?
A sales audit looks at the sales team. This looks at the entire revenue process — from first signal to closed deal to renewal. Most of the problems that get blamed on sales execution are actually process problems that sit between functions.
What if nothing is wrong?
Good. You get a document that confirms it — one you can take to your board. No follow-up work is proposed. That is a perfectly good outcome.
What is the money-back guarantee?
If the assessment does not tell you something about your revenue process that your own team has not already identified, you do not pay. No forms. No conditions.
Who sees the results?
You. It is delivered with a 15-minute video walkthrough. Watch it when you want. Share it with your leadership team or your board if you choose. Or do not. Entirely your call.
What does “cost of the gaps” actually mean?
It is a quarterly revenue figure — how much money the business is likely leaving on the table because of how the process is built. Calculated from your own conversion rates, pricing, and retention. Not a generic benchmark.
Is there a sales pitch at the end?
No. You get the assessment. You decide what to do with it. If the problems need fixing and you want help, that option exists. But nothing about this process is designed to upsell you.
We already have strong sales leadership. Is this still relevant?
Yes. This does not evaluate people. It evaluates the process underneath them. Most companies with strong sales leaders still have structural gaps that nobody inside the function can see — because the problems sit between functions, not within them.